President-elect Donald Trump’s cabinet picks are looking like a who’s who of national nightmare fuel, with everyone from alleged sexual assaulters to anti-vax conspiracy theorists to Dr. Oz. But amid the outwardly alarming nominations is one overlooked disaster-in-waiting: Linda McMahon, who has been nominated to lead the Department of Education.
McMahon, a billionaire who founded and ran the World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) professional wrestling franchise along with her husband, Vince McMahon (they’re separated), is a longtime Trump ally. She has donated millions to his presidential campaigns, co-chairs his transition team, served as the administrator of the Small Business Administration in Trump’s first administration, and was reportedly up for consideration to run the Department of Commerce. She also has very few qualifications for her new role.
From 2009 to 2010, she sat on the Connecticut Board of Education, a seat she earned, she said, because her pal, then-Connecticut governor Jodi Rell, wanted “somebody on the outside” on the board. She was a longtime member of the board of trustees at Sacred Heart University in Fairfield, Connecticut. Other than that, there’s not much about McMahon’s résumé that suggests she’d be competent running the agency that allocates federal assistance to state education departments. And that’s likely the point — Trump spent his campaign vowing to dismantle the Department of Education and putting someone in charge who isn’t qualified is a good way to try to accomplish that goal. Indeed, as Trump posted on Truth Social when announcing McMahon as his choice: “We will send Education BACK TO THE STATES, and Linda will spearhead that effort.” After all, you don’t need someone competent in charge of a department you plan to run into the ground.
The Department of Education as we know it was created by Congress in 1979 during President Jimmy Carter's administration to ensure equitable access for American students. Generally, states run their own education departments and school systems and 90% of all funding for education comes from state and local governments, according to the Washington Post. But the federal Department of Education has a special purpose, much of which has to do with funding. For K-12 education, the department helps support and fund programs, like special education programs for students with disabilities, as well as language programs for multilingual students, career and technical training, professional development for teachers, and emergency funding. In higher education, the department issues student loans, oversees federal financial aid funding, and issues federal Pell Grants, which are awarded to low-income students to help cover the cost of college. The department is also responsible for enforcing civil rights laws to ensure students and staff are not discriminated against based on sex, race, religion, or disability.
Republicans have been trying to gut the Department of Education since the Reagan era. Trump is no exception. Project 2025, a 900-page plan funded by the conservative Heritage Foundation that may function as a roadmap for Trump’s second administration, calls for dismantling the federal Department of Education and cutting federal funding for a litany of programs, including for students with disabilities, and directing those funds to states to use for block grants — i.e., fixed funding — or private school choice programs. On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly vowed to abolish the department as part of his alleged efforts to “drain the swamp,” claiming that the federal government uses tax dollars to “indoctrinate America’s youth” with “wokeness,” despite the fact that the federal Department of Education has little to no say over curriculum.
Trump may not be able to fully realize his dream of abolishing the Department of Education, which would require 60 Senate votes to achieve, but he can downsize the department and that would have far-reaching effects. There is, of course, the impact it would have on low-income students and students with disabilities who rely on federal funding. But there is more at risk than just the loss of that money. Republicans angling for an end to the department have made it clear that they have no interest in the equitable access the Department of Education was created to achieve. One of Trump’s departmental targets is guidance from the Biden administration offering Title IX protections to LGBTQ+ students, as well as a rule that interferes with state laws prohibiting transgender students from, among other things, having the ability to use bathrooms that align with their gender identity. Without federal oversight and protection, states would likely be able to enforce their own discriminatory rules.
Meanwhile, local school boards are banning books, and laws in places like Florida are punishing teachers and administrators who try to teach “woke” subjects touching on race and sexuality. Some red-state school administrations are becoming more blatant in their efforts to muddle the separation between church and state in public schools. Consider the Oklahoma superintendent who mandated that public schools put Bibles in every classroom (initially, they were special Trump-branded Bibles, to boot), or the recent Texas State Board of Education approval allowing Bible-focused lessons in public schools, or Louisiana’s incoming law requiring schools to display the Ten Commandments in all classrooms. Sending education “back to the states” isn’t just an effort to cut federal spending, it’s all part of an effort by state education boards to dismantle public education as we know it by pushing “school choice” (i.e. charter or private schools), infusing the remaining public schools with “conservative values,” and crushing any semblance of equity. Linda McMahon will make it easy for them.
Stay up-to-date with the politics team. Sign up for the Teen Vogue Take
